Yukon Information and Privacy Commissioner
Work we've done
The following are written submissions that the IPC has made to government on specific pieces of Legislation or Programs.
Programs and Projects
The Canadian Information and Privacy Commissioners have unanimously issued the following Resolutions/Position Papers to the federal government and each provincial/territorial government to raise awareness and speak with one voice to the public and governments about these very important issues:
- Is the Information and Privacy Commissioner part of government?
No, the Information and Privacy Commissioner (IPC) is an independent officer of the Yukon Legislative Assembly and is, therefore, not part of the Yukon government.
In Yukon, the IPC is the same person as the Ombudsman and the Public Interest Disclosure Commissioner. For more information about these roles, our website at: http://www.yukonombudsman.ca.
The IPC is responsible for monitoring compliance with HIPMA and the Access to Information and Protection of Privacy Act (ATIPP).
ATIPP applies to Yukon public bodies, such as Yukon government departments. HIPMA applies to custodians (see ‘What is a custodian?’).
The IPC has a number of responsibilities under these Acts and has broad authority to investigate complaints made, including the power to compel production of records and witnesses. Under HIPMA, the IPC has adjudicative authority. This means she can make findings of fact and law that are binding on custodians. At the conclusion of an adjudication, called a ‘consideration’ under HIPMA, she has the authority to recommend any remedy that she determines appropriate.
- When does the IPC hold an Adjudication under ATIPP?
Most requests for review initially proceed to Informal Case Resolution (ICR) to try to settle the issues for review. Where a request for review is not completely settled during ICR, a party can ask the IPC to conduct an adjudication. The IPC has discretion to decide whether to proceed to adjudication.
- What happens in an adjudication?
An adjudication is the final stage in the request for review process and is a formal adjudicative process conducted by the IPC. The parties to an adjudication are entitled to make representations * to the IPC about the issues identified for inquiry. In most inquiries, the representations are made in writing and the parties do not appear before the IPC.
If the IPC decides to proceed to inquiry, a notice of adjudication is issued to the parties. The notice of adjudication outlines the next steps. The notice will confirm:
- the parties to the adjudication,
- the sections of the ATIPP Act that will be considered,
- the issues to adjudicate,
- the timeline for notifying the IPC of any preliminary objections to the adjudication,
- the schedule for delivery and exchange of initial and reply submissions from the parties, and
- a deadline for requesting the IPC’s approval for “in camera”* submission material.
At the adjudication, the IPC considers the Fact Report prepared by the ICR Investigator, the representations received from the parties, reviews any records in dispute, and decides how each issue should be resolved and makes her recommendation(s) *. The IPC issues a written report to the parties setting out her findings, recommendation(s) and reasons for the findings and recommendation(s). Some of the things the IPC can recommend are:
- the release of some or all of the information in a record
- the modification of a fee waiver
- the correction of personal information